Müberra GÜNGÖR / Telecommunication Expert
Gökhan EVREN / Telecommunication Vice Expert / Telecommunication Authority

Internet, Financial, Technical and Regulatory Approaches

Internet sector has displayed a rapid development, especially in the last decade, exceeded well beyond being used for limited aims and caused the rise of a totally new industrial phenomenon. It is such that, it is defined as the greatest technological advance of our age. Since internet emerged by the development of such networks with scientific objectives as ARPANET AND NSFNET the connection among the networks has been unrestricted and this has brought about an unequalled rapid expansion. Besides, the interest of the countries to the sector, the emergence of the new tendency in the form of transition to information society, the fact that developing internet sector has given rise to new job opportunities and income resources and its convergence with other sectors and even including the latter into its body are important signs that the sector will continue to develop rapidly in the future, too.
The number of the persons who use internet in their daily lives is increasing day by day. While the number of internet users worldwide, was 900,000 in 1993, this number reached to 304 million in 2000. By February 2000 this number was realised as 544.2 million.1 However, as in every new technology, this global expansion was not realised in a similar fashion in every region. The use of internet was rapidly increased in North America and Europe as well as in Japan and such East Asian countries as Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore. Latin America, Africa, Middle East and India, on the other hand, lagged behind this development.
By February 2002 181,23 of total users are living in North America. In the countries of Europe and Asia-Pacific this number is 171,35 and 157,49, respectively.2 It is estimated that the number of internet users will reach to 1 billion in 2005.

Interconnection
Local Area Network, briefly refers to the physical connection of the network owned by two different firms and it makes possible the communication of users in different networks. Previously, the flow of datum between firms with networks of equivalent size was realised free of charge within the framework of peering principle. However, by the increase in the number of the companies, which conform to the criteria that were determined for the implementation of peering principle and the transformation of internet into a commercial sector rather than an academic one, the firms began to abandon this practice and tended towards those practices, which depend on the determination of interconnection charge per traffic.3
By interconnection, the first thing that comes to mind is the interconnection between internet service providers (ISP) and consumers. In simple terms, the user pays charge to ISP and acquires the right of connecting to internet over constant network or by means of rented line. Another form of interconnection is that realised between ISP and ISP. The simplest example of this interconnection is regulations of equivalence between network process of similar size, which are mentioned above. Multiple ISP interconnection, on the other hand, can be realised by means of Internet Exchange Points (IEP) which make it possible for more than one ISP in one region to form interconnection.

Access and Capacity Pricing
Especially in those markets where liberalisation is completely achieved it is necessary that the problem of pricing be resolved for the continuity of ISP under competitive conditions. Among the criteria that shall be taken into consideration in the determination of ideal pricing system, especially financial competence, network efficiency, economic efficiency, regulation sufficiency and competitiveness come to the forth. Since wholesale and retail internet services address different consumer groups and have different market structures, they have been subjected to different pricing methodologies. For retail services, those pricing models with fixed charges, which depend on usage and process are among the most frequently used models. For the wholesale market, on the other hand, spot pricing, capacity-based pricing, nonlinear pricing, Paris metro pricing and long-term increasing cost pricing are included in the literature.4 It is possible to come across examples where varieties of pricing listed for retail and wholesale services are practiced in both markets. Although it is considered that some of these varieties of pricing will give optimum results in theory, each and every one might face with some difficulties and thus it is not proposed to use only one methodology.

Secrecy and Security
Although the concepts of secrecy and security are closely related to each other they do not have the same meaning. In essence, both of these two concepts serve for the objective of protecting information. While security is a method for providing secrecy, it is not its "sufficient condition". Security, contains more the prevention of datum from being destroyed by physical means, overcoming the weak points of network, the avoidance of unauthorised accesses.5
By the beginning of the use of internet and especially web for such practices beyond advertisement as e-trade and the development of such job models as B2B (Business to Business) and B2C (Business to Consumer) the issue of internet security has come to the agenda. Security effects the way society views electronic trade and the development of this sector, directly. Effective security measures can only be provided if network and system operators or managers know in detail the processes that are realised during the traffic flow in their own system. However, despite the tremendous increase in cyber-crimes many network operators do not take the necessary precautions before they themselves encounter attacks against security and secrecy.
On the other hand, the objective of e-state, which has rapidly been adopted and become popular, envisages that besides the private sector the state improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the services that it provides by using the opportunities of internet. Especially such opportunities as reducing bureaucratic processes and providing more rapid service to society, enabling tax-payment over internet, realising such high-cost services as census and elections more rapidly and efficiently reinforce the attractiveness of e-state objective. However, in the application stage of the opportunities mentioned we face with the criteria of security and secrecy, Within this framework it is possible to say that the steps that will be taken in relation to internet security are the prerequisites of e-state objective.

Regulation Policies
Since internet was initially constructed to serve academic world rather than being commercial it was not thought to be subjected to any regulation. There are different views between countries about the issue that those subjects of internet, which developed with such an understanding and became a commercial sector, as interconnection, content supply, sound transfer over internet might be a matter of regulation. In general, the view that the regulation of internet by state will negatively effect the development of sector and that the establishment of the environment of competition in the sector shall be preferred to regulations is prevailing. Starting from this understanding, especially internet access sector is subject to ex post practices rather than ex ante regulations. In other words, when a situation that violates competition in the sector is realised regulatory authorities prefer the form of intervention, otherwise it is expected that market dynamics give form to the sector. On the other hand, it is commonly accepted that the schedules of prices related to capacity services supplied by backbone providers - which in fact refer to a different market from internet access sector - be cost-based due to the fact that these services are generally provided by the enterprises, which have monopoly status or that there are no other services that would replace this service. In this framework, it is possible to meet regulations related to the market, frequently, just as in our country, in the Maximum Price Notification published by our Institution on 11.01.2002, the B Basket contain rented digital lines and it is envisaged that these services shall in priority be approved within the framework of existing conditions according to Maximum Price Formula and additionally - starting from 01.01.2003 - according to cost principal.
Effective competition conditions shall mold the internet sector rather than the intervention of regulatory authorities. In this scope the countries shall encourage the establishment of competitive market in the sector. As in many sectors the indicator of the level of competition in the market can be determined by resort to such criteria as whether it is available for the entrance of new actors, opportunity of growth for existing small entrepreneurs. These conditions can be provided by keeping such elements at a reasonable axis as the distribution term, capacity, schedules of prices of rented lines supplied to ISPs by backbone provider, which possesses dominant/effective market power and the establishment of interconnections that it should form with the other backbone companies. The ISPs, that provide retail internet access service to the last user are dependent on the entrepreneurs that are located at a lower layer internet value chain (such as backbone providers, capacity services provider). The appearance of enterprises in the value chain concerned in markets that are located at other layers (vertical unification) and the preference of the enterprises to unify among themselves (consolidation) reduce the level of competition and opportunity of selection in the sector.6 Therefore the regulatory authorities should be cautious against such practices that might prevent the development of competition in the sector.
Not disregarding those practices that might arise as a result of dominant or effective market power as price discrimination, fatal pricing that might restrict competition is also important for the future of the sector.

Internet in Turkey
In our country internet was first introduced by a connection with 64 KB/sec established with the USA within the scope of a project supported by TUBITAK on 12 April 1993. Although internet has been used in our country for approximately 10 years, development was not realised as rapid as it was in other countries. In our country, the - estimated - number of users which was 1.5 million in 1999 has reached to 2 million in 2000 and to 2.5 million in 2001. The number of personal computer has displayed a development of similar proportion and increased from 2.2 million in 1999 to 2.5 million in 2000 and 2.7 million in 2001. The number of hosts in our country was 106,556 in 2001 and realised 35 % increase compared to 1999. The low number of personal computers and income level can be cited among the reasons behind this slow development. However, it is prospected that there is a great potential of development for internet sector in our country and in the coming years there will be a more rapid increase in the proportion of understanding the real meaning of internet as compared to the past years.
For the time being, a great majority of the market of internet access market in our country is constituted of dial-up networking and such technologies ADSL, Cable Modem are yet in the process of development. However, in the process of transition into information society, developments in this respect are still rather insufficient in the direction of the principle of "more rapid and cheaper internet access for society". The technologies concerned have great importance due to the fact that possess potential for providing broadband access opportunities by realising some investments on existing networks. As known, by the use of a digital modem by the user and such instruments as ASAM/DSLM by the operator on the ADSL, PSTN infrastructure the capacity of existing copper cables can be increased by many folds. In the network of Turk Telecom there is ADSL port capacity that support 3072 users and 2964 users.8 Apart from that in the meetings conducted with Turk Telecom it was stated that a bid for a new ADSL port that will support 500,000 users countrywide was opened, which will be finalised in near future. The realisation of the concerned development will form a very significant development for Turkish people and mean an escape for Turkish people from being restricted to dial-up internet access.
On the other hand, it is clear that analysis regarding the supply of ADSL service by other ISPs will be appropriate for the sake of both service variety and improvements in the level of schedule of prices as well as the survival of operators that are located outside TTNet in the market.
Another technology, which provides broadband internet access opportunity by means of a reasonable investment in existing networks is internet access over Cable TV network. For the time being, due to the "Income Sharing Partnership" system such indicators as each and every company provide service to a very limited number of customers with very different schedules of prices in different regions show that this system operate in a rather unhealthy mode. Although it is not found to be possible for all ISPs to share the same network technically due to the infrastructure of Cable TV, it is required that this market be also opened to competition and expansion of networks be encouraged by means of some of the ISPs' sharing the frequency band or bandwidth. In this respect, with the aim of improving the efficiency of the system the companies should immediately be taken into the license system.
In accordance with the view of "more rapid and cheaper internet access", which was also mentioned beforehand it is considered that internet access telephone prices be kept lower and a fund be formed in order that possible service losses not be met only by Turk Telecom and that the whole sector and state must contribute to this fund. Apart from that, state policy should be formed and some conveniences like tax reduction should be provided with the aim of keeping internet access prices at lower levels.
In the end of the studies carried out by our Institution it was revealed that many ISPs have a complaint about the quality levels of (QoS) Turk Telecom. In this respect, it was demanded that Service Level Agreements, which contain such matters as supply term of the services demanded especially in relation to capacity services, how the troubles that arise in the use of the service will be overcome and guarantee service quality be prepared by Turk Telecom and submitted to Telecommunication Authority. The existence of Service Level Agreements will first provide that the services that ISPs receive be at a certain standard and second give rise to the opportunity that consumers receive better service.
For the constitution of competitive market in telecommunication sector, increasing consumer welfare to high levels and taking the most appropriate decisions related to the future of the sector it is required that effective cooperation be provided between regulatory authorities and companies and civil society organisation representing the consumers. In this context, with the aim of removing the phenomenon of "asymmetrical information" it is of utmost importance that all companies transfer accurate information in proper time to Telecommunication Authority.
In accordance with the "ideal of establishing information society" the issues of security and secrecy in the internet have taken their place in the agenda of our country. Utilisation of internet by the whole society and establishment of e-state are considered to be the principal touchstones in the constitution of information society. As also mentioned beforehand, the improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided by the state and facilitating such high cost activities as census, elections reveal the importance of the e-state objective. In order that all these services be provided individuals must be defined in the virtual environment. It is estimated that the final form of Draft e-signature Proposed Law, which was prepared in this respect will be realised soon. However, beyond this it should not be disregarded that social consciousness and concern will have more effective contributions in reaching the concerned goals.
Internet has rapidly developed without being subject to opposite regulations of other industries in communication sector and thus many regulatory authorities pursue a non-interventionist approach. Besides, it should not be overlooked that there is a rather fragile point within the framework of this approach. In the case of total disregard of the sector there is a risk that the subject might turn into a great mess with respect to the relations both among the companies themselves and between the former and consumers. In this context, experiences gained from world practices underline the fact that observations of regulatory authorities and policy of pursuit represent great significance.

References
1. Global Research, Global Internet Statistics
2. www.nua.com
3. Telecommunication Reform, Interconnection Regulation, ITU, 2001
4. Comparative Pricing Methodologies for Wholesale Broadband Services, Christian Michael Dippon, National Economic Research Associates, June 2001.
5. Privacy Enhancing Technologies, OECD, 9-10 October 2001.
6.Interconnection in the Telecommunication Industry: A Techno-Economic Introduction, M.A. Poell, Prof. Dr. P. Verhoest, March 2001.
7. ITU Telecommunication Indicators, 2002.
8 .Turkish Telecommunication Joint Venture.